Friday, November 23, 2012

JEREMY SCOTT AND ALL THE OTHER FOOLS

                                              Negro Ink    E. L. PLEASANT


                                             JEREMY SCOTT
BLACKS ONLY
 
 
 
Los Angeles-based designer Jeremy Scott is trying to weather the controversy over his collaboration with Adidas. The JS Roundhouse Mids, which were supposed to be released in August, feature ankle shackles, which sparked some talk that the sneakers were racist and recalled slavery. Today, Adidas cancelled the shoes, even though the company had denied any connection to slavery earlier.

In a statement yesterday, Adidas said, "The design of the JS Roundhouse Mid is nothing more than the designer Jeremy Scott’s outrageous and unique take on fashion and has nothing to do with slavery. Jeremy Scott is renowned as a designer whose style is quirky and lighthearted and his previous shoe designs for adidas Originals have, for example, included panda heads and Mickey Mouse. Any suggestion that this is linked to slavery is untruthful." Today, Adidas basically said the same thing, but added, "We apologize if people are offended by the design and we are withdrawing our plans to make them available in the marketplace."

Scott has been trying to explain his inspiration:

“MY WORK HAS ALWAYS BEEN INSPIRED BY CARTOONS, TOYS & MY CHILDHOOD… Yes, the shoe is apparently a reference to My Pet Monster, a '90s toy.”

But the Rev. Jesse Jackson is having none of that. In a column on the Huffington Post, Jackson wrote:

The attempt to commercialize and make popular more than 200 years of human degradation, where blacks were considered three-fifths human by our Constitution is offensive, appalling and insensitive. Removing the chains from our ankles and placing them on our shoes is no progress

For Adidas to promote the athleticism and contributions of a variety of African-American sports legends -- especially Olympic heroes Wilma Rudolph and Jesse Owens and boxing great Muhammad Ali -- and then allow such a degrading symbol of African-American history to pass through its corporate channels and move toward actual production and advertisement, is insensitive and corporately irresponsible.

These slave shoes are odious and we as a people should be called to resent and resist them. If put into production and placed on the market, protests and pickets signs will follow. Adidas cannot make a profit at the expense of commercialized human degradation.

Adidas told the Daily News, "Since the shoe debuted on our Facebook page ahead of its market release in August, adidas has received both favorable and critical feedback."

The shoes would have cost $350. For four times that, you can get a Kanye West-designed Nike Air Yeezy 2 on eBay.

 

Sometimes there is no excuse for ignorance, especially when you believe that you are superior.  Yet they come up with the same recycled lines, of what their intentions suppose to have expressed.  Their unique or bold fashion statement or what ever the case may be at the time while they reveal their stupidity.  This is a grown ass man of some sort that claimed to have patterned his shoes after some toy, where as he and his toys need to remain in the closet.  Then for Adidas to come to his defense, which I would not have expected less because they are just as much the blame as the great Jeremy Scott, for they gave him the green light.  Then to foolishly say, “He made other shoes with Mickey Mouse and no one was offended.”  We are always the butt of their jokes, not the females but the men.  In their movies we’re never the educated person or the intelligent one, but always the comic relief in fiction and reality.  We didn’t end up in slavery because of their intelligent but God’s will.  For the first shall be last and the last shall be first, therefore we were once first and we shall be again, because the Bible said so.  It is time to wake up, stand up and speak up.  A school in Rochester put on black face last year for home coming, portraying Bobby Brown’s alcoholism and Whitney’s drug addiction and no one found it disrespectful enough to speak up.  This year they decided to do it again in black face.  This time portraying Chris Brown beating Rihanna, before someone spoke up, and the first things to come out of their mouths were” They wasn’t trying to offended anyone, no one complained last year.  Wow!  The same things take place in the work place as well when it comes time for promotion and you are over looked or not thought of.  Then they say, “They didn’t think you were interested or all of a sudden you just don’t have the qualifications after you have trained half of the people they seem to keep promoting.    

Victoria’s Secret apologizes last week after use of Native American headdress in fashion show draws outrage.  The Company responded to the complaints over the weekend by saying it was sorry to have upset anyone and that it wouldn’t include the outfit in the show’s television broadcast next month, or in any marketing materials.


“We sincerely apologize as we absolutely had no intention to offend anyone,” the company said

THIS IS WHAT THE WHITE PEOPLE SAID:  Thousand of people have commented about the outfit on the company’s Facebook page.  Some praised Kloss’ attire as artistic and urged those offended by it to “get over it.”

THE NATIVE AMERICAN’S:  “We have gone through the atrocities to survive and ensure our way of life continues,” Navajo Nations spokesman Ermy Zah said in an interview Monday.  “Any mockery, whether it’s Halloween, Victoria’s Secret – they are spitting on us.  They are spitting on our culture, and it’s upsetting.”

HISTORICALLY, headdresses are a symbol of respect, worn by Native American war chiefs and warriors.  For Great Plains tribes, for instance, each feather placed on a headdress has significance and had to be earned through an act of compassion or bravery.

It is easy for the white people to be ignorant about another race feelings, for not one have yet to have their homes entered into, and found their mothers, daughters, wives raped, then butchered or sold in the middle of the night, to have to live within the past and future memories there of.

You have never seen a Native American male or female disgrace themselves in public or on
Televisions shaking their ass or two women kissing have you?  I guess it is too late for us
to talk about becoming a proud race once more.  For THINKING OUT LOUD, I’m
E. L. PLEASANT.

 
 
                                                STORY BY:
                                                E. L. PLEASANT
                                                STORY EDITOR
                                                BRANDON DE’LEONCE
                                                MUSIC BY:
                                                BONONIASOUND
                                                SHINERECORDS
                                                ISTOCK PHOTO
                                                PRODUTION MANAGER
                                                JOHN WESLEY


THIS PRODUCTION OF THINKING OUT LOUD IS PROTECTED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER COUNTRIES, AND ITS UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION, ELECTRONIC DISTRIBUTION OR EXHIBITION MAY RESULT IN CIVIL LIABILITY AND CRIMINAL PROSECUTION

  

                                                COPYRIGHT © 2012
                                                E’SDROP PUBLISHING

 

COUNTRY OF FIRST PUBLICATION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

SPECIAL THANKS TO THE FOLLOWING CONTRIBUTORS:

The Bing Corporation
Black Voices
Huffington Post
Yahoo
You Tube
Istockphoto
Bononiasound
Shinerecords
Malcolmxfiles.blogspot.com
Cornel West
AP
NBC
Kevin Young
Ashwini Bhatia
Andrew Jacobs
 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment